“This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a “Corona Scandal” and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages. On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas. And for this reason I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.”

- - German-Amercan attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, who is taking out a class action, probably in Canada, for the consequences of the PCR Test fraud and COVID-19 government and media fraud. Fuellmich is supported by the work of an international team of court judges, doctors, scientists, economists, entrepreneurs, experts and business lawyers.  They will plead the biggest tort case of all time.

The big news from yesterday’s FA Cup Final between Leicester and Chelsea?  OK, it was the first crowd - just 20,000 strong - to be admitted to watch a match since the third lockdown started.  It was also the first time in their long history (they were founded in 1884) that Leicester City have lifted the trophy, after a 1-0 victory.  But the interesting political news from Wembley is that the fans booed the hallowed pre-match BLM moment.  Just like old times.  Sadly, there was no light airplane towing a banner overhead to remind the European-descended millionaires debasing themselves on the pitch that White Lives Matter too.

Apparently, the BBC’s pee-cee engineers leapt into action to turn the amps down on the broadcast feed so viewers did not have to hear working-class white men’s disdain for the BLM insult, enabling the rest of the corporate media to downplay the event.  “Social media” ... that’s Handwringers’ Central to you and me, since they’re all that’s left on TwittBook ... reacted according to corporate requirements.  But someone forgot to moderate the Daily Mail thread.  Click the first link above and have a read if you want to know what non-handwringers think.

There must be many nationalists who have asked themselves, “Why Israel?  Why is the Israeli Likud government ... supposedly the nationalist government of the most ethnocentric and tribal people on the planet, uttery persuaded of its own g-d given right to minister forever over of all humankind ... why is that government coercing and deceiving its Jewish population, including pregnant women and children, into taking the Pfizer jab; and why is it racing ahead with the roll-out of the instrument of totalitarian control which is the Covid passport?  Why, of all governments, has that government collectively taken upon itself the task of experimenting on, of all peoples, that people and, if Mike Yeadon and others are to be believed, of committing them to a future of fatally compromised physical and reproductive health?

At the very least they, the Israeli government, cannot know that the Pfizer jab is safe, most especially for babies in the womb.  No democratic governments are elected to gamble with the life of the unborn.  But while nationalists across the developed world readily suspect their own governments, aided and abetted by formal Jewish organisations, of such venality, still there was an understanding that Israel’s Jews would always be kept safe by their politicians.  That was the famous Jewish double standard: “Universalism for you, nationalism for me.”  It was an article of faith for seven-decades of nationalists after the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel was proclaimed on 14 May 1948 by David Ben-Gurion.  And yet here we are, with the Israeli people committed by their government to the same perilous path as the rest of us.

It just does not fit with the standard nationalist narrative of Talmudic struggle, or with the Zionist struggle, or with the post-1980s sanctification of the six million and, thereby, of every Jewish life.  If these things have been let go by the Jewish elites in Israel in favour of the Schwabian Re-Set and, furthermore, if it involves the oft-alleged strategy of mass depopulating vaccination, it represents the most extraordinary reversal of ethnic investment and unity, comity and service any of us have ever seen.

Here, to validate the process, is the passionate testimony of Ilana Rachel Daniel to the Dutch video platform blckbx.tv.  She is a health worker and, now, an activist and information officer for a new political human rights party named Rappeh:

https://rumble.com/embed/vd2935/?pub=4

You don’t have to listen to the whole interview because the meat of it is stated over the first 2 minutes and 46 seconds.  That said, one very interesting fact from later in the interview is that the Israeli state machine, the social media giants, major employers, banking sector and so forth are treating dissenters exactly as the parallel institutions in the UK treat salient dissenters and nationalists here.  As the lady says, “They are making this complete Re-Set.”  Olam ha-ba it ain’t.

As a side comment, the behaviour of the elites in Israel puts me in mind of a VDare article by Peter Brimelow that I read back in 2004, on the tenth anniversary of the publishing of The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life.  Brimelow remembered his friendship and his last meeting with the Jewish-American psychologist Richard Herrnstein, who co-wrote the book with Charles Murray.  Herrnstein was dying from lung cancer, and Brimelow was able to visit him close to the end and press into his hands a pre-release copy of the book.  Brimelow described him as “a great man”, and he certainly might have been a remarkably observant and prescient one given that his motivation for writing the book was to warn against the developing caesura - he called it cognitive dissonance - within the body of his own people between its elites and its masses.

His thesis seems now to have become fact inside Israel in the most definitive way.  Is there any other explanation for the extraordinary events in that country?

I have not been able to interest myself in the Super-League debacle, largely because I would have preferred the game of African kick-ball which English professional football has become to die out, to be honest.  But here, anyway, is a pretty good, historically-grounded and factually accurate analysis by NativistConcern of the attempt to take the Big Six truly global, and destroy the rest of African kick-ball in the process.

It’s just a pity that the video-maker is another one lost to the poetic lie of heroism and the life of glory - and more a pity because, actually, he has a real feel for the life and culture of the old working-class.

Not much.  But it’s a win and it appears to be unusual.

However, is it unusual that a case like this appears on the front age of the Telegraph website, or are these cases unusual?  Is it that the media have not really reported them or do indigenous Brits simply put up with arrogant big mouthery from non-whites in positions of authority over them?

Worker told ‘English people are lazy drunks’ wins discrimination claim
A transport company employee who was an ethnic minority at his workplace has won a discrimination claim after his colleagues jeered that the English were lazy drunks.

James Heeley, an administrator at Birk Holdings, was repeatedly teased about his nationality by his co-workers, who asked whether he was “still drunk” when he came to the office.

His boss, Gurvinder Singh Birk, was overheard saying English employees are “lazy and only interested in claiming benefits”.

Mr Heeley was one of five white British employees at the company of 16 - making him a “minority”, the employment tribunal in Bury St Edmunds heard.

... Mr Birk was ordered to pay Mr Heeley £2,500 in compensation for injury to feelings, and a further £961.74 for breaching employment law.

Mr Heeley began working at Birk Holdings in Peterborough in October 2017 and was sacked in March 2019 by Mr Birk, who cited concerns about his performance, attendance and time keeping.

The tribunal panel, chaired by Employment Judge Jennifer Bartlett, found that he was subjected to numerous derogatory comments.

Senior employees said “English drivers do drive slowly” and accused Mr Heeley of not working hard because “he’s English”, the tribunal heard.

On one occasion, two colleagues sneered: “Can tell you’re British as you don’t have your coat on. Are you still drunk from last night?”

After Mr Heeley took a few days off sick, an employee said: “Oh, the lazy English worker has decided to come back to work”. The same employee commented: “Lazy English workers are always off sick”.

Mr Birk was said to have told a senior employee not to hire British workers because they “can turn you down easily and claim benefits”.

The tribunal panel agreed that Mr Heeley had suffered race discrimination and harassment.

It concluded: “We consider that the comments are serious such that they create a hostile and/or intimidating environment because they are by a number of reasonably senior individuals, over a period of time, repeated and in a workplace in which the claimant was a minority.

“We do not accept that the fact that he called some of the comments jokes undermines their effect on him. Many extremely unpleasant behaviours can be dressed up as jokes but it is no excuse.”

Will the controlled media be as callous and disinterested as it is with the murder of Ashli Babbitt?  Will it be a case of “Race? What race?”

Since its inception in 2005 Conservative Home has become an “indispensable read” for Tory party members and MPs, particularly those of a centrist persuasion.  These days it is edited by Paul Goodman, who maintains a rigorous guard against any suggestion (and I mean any suggestion) of nationalist critique among the commentariat, while allowing hating lefties free range to attack all and sundry for any backsliding on ethnic suicidalism.  It is not entirely clear how Mr Goodman would feel, say, should ethnic suicidalism ever grip the gentlefolk of Israel.

But today someone let Richard Ritchie, not a Jew but Enoch Powell’s archivist, to post an abridged version of a 16,000 word paper he has authored.  Its subject is the parliamentary history of immigration.  Cue a deadly bunfight below the line, but a bunfight which has lacked the usual viciously partisan moderation.  One can’t help wondering what all those so so respectable centrists are thinking as they peruse the thread.  How to survive the conniptions, probably.  No doubt order will be restored tomorrow.

The Telegraph reports:

Nigel Farage quits politics - and this time he means it
The Reform Party leader is stepping back after almost three decades. But he’s still got the woke brigade in his crosshairs

Mr Farage announces he is resigning as leader of the Reform Party and turning his back on politics after three decades of political street fighting.

He says: “There is no going back - Brexit is done. That won’t be reversed. I know I’ve come back once or twice when people thought I’d gone, but this is it. It’s done. It’s over.

...

He adds: “Now’s the moment for me to say I’ve knocked on my last door. I’m going to step down as the leader of Reform UK. I’ll have no executive position at all. I’m quite happy to have an honorary one, but party politics, campaigning, being involved in elections, that is now over for me because I’ve achieved the one thing I set out to do: to achieve the independence of the UK.”

The 56-year-old insists that he had no plans to retire, saying: “I’m not packing up. I’m not off to play golf four afternoons a week and have half a bitter afterwards. That’s not happening.” Instead, he will be trying to influence the national debate on China’s influence in the UK and the battles over the so-called culture wars.

He says he wants to “do battle” on two “very big” issues: “One is the extent to which the Chinese Communist Party is taking over our lives and certainly has undue influence in our country. And the other thing [is] the ‘woke agenda’ - literally the indoctrination of our children from primary school all the way through university with now a completely different interpretation of history.

Farage, of course, has form for resigning and returning, and a lot of people in possession of a memory will greet his retirement news with some cynicism.  After all, it’s only five minutes since he relaunched The Brexit Party as Reform UK, supposedly focussing on lockdown and Covid strategy.  Now he’s thrown that over completely, invented an anti-Chinese cause to talk up, and returned to flirting with the culture war agenda currently in the hands of Laurence Fox and his Reclaim Party (who announced today that he will stand in the London mayoral election, which sounds like a bad idea to me).  Farage the great communicator was, it seems, a terrible political manager to the last.

One should, of course, give him his due for his role in freeing this country (excluding Northern Ireland, obviously) from the EU project.  That achievement alone secures his place in British history.  The patriotic right will be poorer for his absence from party politics.  Nationalism, however, may gain substantially from it.